In the last post, I was talking about how we tend to put people into categories when people don’t easily fit categories. This applies particularly to understanding where we are in relationship to God or whether we even have a relationship with God.
I find very curious the whole debate over what some people call “once saved always saved” or “eternal security,” referring to the idea that you cannot fall from grace, as opposed to the idea that you can keep falling in and out of grace. What’s odd about all the arguments on each side of the debate is that they are asking entirely the wrong question. We don’t need to be asking can we or have we fallen from grace as much as we need to be asking where we are in our relationship with God right now.
A similar question is whether you can do such-and-such and still be saved. It is a silly question, to say the least. It would be like a man asking his wife, God forbid, “how far I can go in committing adultery and we still be happily married.” Duh! If you have to ask, you’re in the doghouse already.
The walk of faith is not a category, like a club membership or some such. Either I am moving toward God or I am not. And the walk of faith is always a process that exclusive emphases on crisis decision-making or on experientialism denies.
Such is the dilemma of using the term “Christian” as an adjective, as in a Christian businessman or a Christian nation or Christian music or a Christian school. When we label something we do two things.
First, we arbitrarily define it in ways that may not apply. For example, what makes a businessman or a nation or a selection of music or a school “Christian”? I am not even talking about defining the world “Christian.” I am talking about defining these other things.
Take music. Does the style make it Christian, as in “gospel” music? What about “Christian” hymns written to old drinking songs? Is it Christian only if it refers to God or Jesus? The book of Esther in the Bible does not refer to God, whereas some “secular” literature talks about God a lot. Does that make Esther non-Christian in this sense? What about whether it espouses Christian values? Then we have to make sure we agree on what those values are, how they are to be espoused and so on. Oft times national or cultural values are confused with “Christian” in the larger world. Gets downright confusing.
Is a song “Christian” only if it is sung by a Believer in Jesus Christ? Does that make a Christmas carol sung by a nonbeliever a non-Christian song? What about a “secular” song like, say, “America the Beautiful” sung by a Christian in church on July 4 Sunday? I once heard of people in an international church in Taipei “getting saved” through a Filipina singing “White Christmas”. Does that also make Bing Crosby a Christian just because he wrote that song?
Second, and more importantly, we run the highly likely risk (which makes it less of a risk if it is highly likely) that we will dilute the term “Christian,” thus profaning it. For example, some people call America a “Christian” nation. What then happens when that nation does some very unchristian things? In such a case, the name of Christ is taken in vain, meaning we have profaned the name of Jesus just as much as if we were the proverbially drunken sailor stumbling down the street crying out “Jesus Christ this” and “Jesus Christ that.”
There are all kinds of things labeled as Christian these days that have nothing to do with Jesus and there are all kinds of things not labeled as Christian that have everything to do with Jesus. I may call my school or my club or my newspaper or my song or even myself “Christian.” But if I do so, I better be sure I am not breaking the 3rd Commandment.
2009-06-10
Authenticity, Idols and Profanity – Part IV
I often joke that there are two kinds of people in this world, those who put people into categories and those who don’t. I may joke that way, but I really do not like labels. On myself or anyone else for that matter. Sometimes labels are helpful. When you go to school it can be useful to know whether you are in the fifth or the sixth grade.
But most people do not precisely fit the labels they are assigned. For example, I may be placed in the sixth grade because of my age or when I started school or because I sufficiently passed the fifth grade or because my fifth grade teacher dreaded the thought of having me again. For whatever collection of reasons, I am in the sixth grade. But emotionally I may be a fifth grader and in math I may be an eighth grader and in reading I may be a sixth grader and physically I may fit more with the seventh graders. On it goes.
No individual fits any humanly-defined categories exactly for the very reason that no two individuals are alike. There’s an old joke that goes along the lines of “when God made so-and-so, He broke the mold.” Truth is, that applies to every single person that ever lived.
In three ways are we all alike. One, we were made in God’s likeness, Two, we have fallen from that likeness into what theologians call sin, meaning we have gotten off-centered in God and are operating out of a self-centeredness that is destructive both to ourselves and to all those with whom we come into contact. And three, even in that state of fallenness there is an insatiable hunger to know God.
Now some people teach that there are many paths to or back to God or that you don’t need to try to get “back to” God at all, either because He doesn’t exist or because it doesn’t matter. Others teach that there is only one way back to God and we better find it. At least to a certain extent, all these ideas are wrong. For one, they are all very human-centered as opposed to God-centered, meaning they are idolatrous. For another, they fail to take into consideration the sheer diversity with which God has created mankind.
I do believe, and this is one of the few absolutes I adhere to in life, that the way to God is through Jesus Christ. By this I mean, that because of our self-deception (our idolatry), God has chosen to reveal Himself and His love through His son, Jesus. But how He works in each of us to bring us to truth and life is as varied as the spectrum in which we were created by God.
I was just writing to a friend about the odd expression, “It’s not over till the fat lady sings.” The ring of truth in that awkward metaphorical mix of opera and sports echoes what Jesus taught. Don’t pull out the weeds until harvest time, he tells his agrarian-based audience, or you’ll mess up the wheat. On another occasion, he says, that while some of us plant and others water, God is responsible for producing the harvest, meaning that only in the end will it all be sorted out and by God alone.
People often ask, what about those who have never heard? What about the person who commits suicide? What about the infant who dies before reaching the age of accountability? What about my grandpa who died in a coma and we weren’t sure if he was saved? What about my dog? Will they make it to heaven? Best to do all we can in life to make sure we are ready and leave the rest to God. In the case of dogs, leave them all to God.
But most people do not precisely fit the labels they are assigned. For example, I may be placed in the sixth grade because of my age or when I started school or because I sufficiently passed the fifth grade or because my fifth grade teacher dreaded the thought of having me again. For whatever collection of reasons, I am in the sixth grade. But emotionally I may be a fifth grader and in math I may be an eighth grader and in reading I may be a sixth grader and physically I may fit more with the seventh graders. On it goes.
No individual fits any humanly-defined categories exactly for the very reason that no two individuals are alike. There’s an old joke that goes along the lines of “when God made so-and-so, He broke the mold.” Truth is, that applies to every single person that ever lived.
In three ways are we all alike. One, we were made in God’s likeness, Two, we have fallen from that likeness into what theologians call sin, meaning we have gotten off-centered in God and are operating out of a self-centeredness that is destructive both to ourselves and to all those with whom we come into contact. And three, even in that state of fallenness there is an insatiable hunger to know God.
Now some people teach that there are many paths to or back to God or that you don’t need to try to get “back to” God at all, either because He doesn’t exist or because it doesn’t matter. Others teach that there is only one way back to God and we better find it. At least to a certain extent, all these ideas are wrong. For one, they are all very human-centered as opposed to God-centered, meaning they are idolatrous. For another, they fail to take into consideration the sheer diversity with which God has created mankind.
I do believe, and this is one of the few absolutes I adhere to in life, that the way to God is through Jesus Christ. By this I mean, that because of our self-deception (our idolatry), God has chosen to reveal Himself and His love through His son, Jesus. But how He works in each of us to bring us to truth and life is as varied as the spectrum in which we were created by God.
I was just writing to a friend about the odd expression, “It’s not over till the fat lady sings.” The ring of truth in that awkward metaphorical mix of opera and sports echoes what Jesus taught. Don’t pull out the weeds until harvest time, he tells his agrarian-based audience, or you’ll mess up the wheat. On another occasion, he says, that while some of us plant and others water, God is responsible for producing the harvest, meaning that only in the end will it all be sorted out and by God alone.
People often ask, what about those who have never heard? What about the person who commits suicide? What about the infant who dies before reaching the age of accountability? What about my grandpa who died in a coma and we weren’t sure if he was saved? What about my dog? Will they make it to heaven? Best to do all we can in life to make sure we are ready and leave the rest to God. In the case of dogs, leave them all to God.
2009-06-03
Authenticity, Idols and Profanity – Part III
So if idolatry is more than just manmade figurines like we saw in National Geographic when we were kids and profanity is more than just using swear words, what are they?
In Jesus’ day, there were plenty of people walking around saying they were fully devoted to God. They spent lots of time doing spiritual things, like praying and going to synagogue (their equivalent of our modern-day church meetings) and even giving to the poor. They were careful not to break any of the Ten Commandments, including and especially the two commandments dealing with making “graven images” or idols and with taking God’s name in vain.
And, yet, after all that, Jesus tells these religious people that their righteousness is as filthy rags (which has a rather vulgar connotation, I might add) and that God won’t even recognize them when they try to get into heaven, thus implying that they won’t be able to do so.
Now, why are their attempts at doing right so wrong? Much of it has to do with motive, with intent. You can do all the right things for all the wrong reasons. Their righteous behavior was actually a form of idolatry.
Today there is much talk in the secular world about spirituality. By “spirituality” people mean something that is other than material, but also other than religious. There is a great recognition in our day and age that materialism in all its many forms is wholly inadequate for satisfying the spiritual hunger of us mortals. So people are returning to a search for spiritual fulfillment. But in doing so they are looking for avenues other than the traditional religious ones, recognizing, rightly so, that these routes can be as useless as material pursuits.
The problem such people are having is that they are attempting to build a spiritual “house” without a God-foundation, something that cannot be done. For any attempt to be other-focused apart from God will inevitably turn into self-focus, which as we’ve said is the spiritual equivalent of a black hole in outer space.
Oddly enough, religious people are attempting the same thing. They are trying to use the secular spiritual terminology to appear contemporary, but it feels very inauthentic to their nonbelieving neighbors, and sometimes rightly so. For that secular spirituality is a spirituality that tries to bypass God and you can’t have a God-centered spirituality that at the same time bypasses God. Such is the definition of a non sequitor, something that doesn’t line up.
So these attempts at spirituality, by religious or by nonreligious people, are just as idolatrous as the attempts by religious people to appear religious for selfish reasons. The least that can be said for the nonreligous attempt at spirituality is that it can at times be a more honest attempt.
An honest nonbeliever is a whole lot more pleasing to God than a dishonest believer. An agnostic who says she really doesn’t know and yet is earnestly seeking to know is headed in the right direction. A self-proclaimed atheist and a smug Believer are two peas in the same pod. They’ve stopped asking questions and in so doing are deeply dishonest and have fallen into the worst form of self-deception – idolatry.
Smugness, by the way, is a very intense form of idolatry, for it says that I am right beyond all doubt. In other words, it is a rightness which cannot be questioned. By removing my rightness from questioning, I put myself in grave danger of being very wrong and not having any awareness to reverse direction. I therefore damn myself beyond hope. Thus the reason Jesus says that some very highly devoted religious people will lose it all in the end.
In Jesus’ day, there were plenty of people walking around saying they were fully devoted to God. They spent lots of time doing spiritual things, like praying and going to synagogue (their equivalent of our modern-day church meetings) and even giving to the poor. They were careful not to break any of the Ten Commandments, including and especially the two commandments dealing with making “graven images” or idols and with taking God’s name in vain.
And, yet, after all that, Jesus tells these religious people that their righteousness is as filthy rags (which has a rather vulgar connotation, I might add) and that God won’t even recognize them when they try to get into heaven, thus implying that they won’t be able to do so.
Now, why are their attempts at doing right so wrong? Much of it has to do with motive, with intent. You can do all the right things for all the wrong reasons. Their righteous behavior was actually a form of idolatry.
Today there is much talk in the secular world about spirituality. By “spirituality” people mean something that is other than material, but also other than religious. There is a great recognition in our day and age that materialism in all its many forms is wholly inadequate for satisfying the spiritual hunger of us mortals. So people are returning to a search for spiritual fulfillment. But in doing so they are looking for avenues other than the traditional religious ones, recognizing, rightly so, that these routes can be as useless as material pursuits.
The problem such people are having is that they are attempting to build a spiritual “house” without a God-foundation, something that cannot be done. For any attempt to be other-focused apart from God will inevitably turn into self-focus, which as we’ve said is the spiritual equivalent of a black hole in outer space.
Oddly enough, religious people are attempting the same thing. They are trying to use the secular spiritual terminology to appear contemporary, but it feels very inauthentic to their nonbelieving neighbors, and sometimes rightly so. For that secular spirituality is a spirituality that tries to bypass God and you can’t have a God-centered spirituality that at the same time bypasses God. Such is the definition of a non sequitor, something that doesn’t line up.
So these attempts at spirituality, by religious or by nonreligious people, are just as idolatrous as the attempts by religious people to appear religious for selfish reasons. The least that can be said for the nonreligous attempt at spirituality is that it can at times be a more honest attempt.
An honest nonbeliever is a whole lot more pleasing to God than a dishonest believer. An agnostic who says she really doesn’t know and yet is earnestly seeking to know is headed in the right direction. A self-proclaimed atheist and a smug Believer are two peas in the same pod. They’ve stopped asking questions and in so doing are deeply dishonest and have fallen into the worst form of self-deception – idolatry.
Smugness, by the way, is a very intense form of idolatry, for it says that I am right beyond all doubt. In other words, it is a rightness which cannot be questioned. By removing my rightness from questioning, I put myself in grave danger of being very wrong and not having any awareness to reverse direction. I therefore damn myself beyond hope. Thus the reason Jesus says that some very highly devoted religious people will lose it all in the end.
2009-05-27
Authenticity, Idols and Profanity – Part II
Let’s make it clear from the start. God is not threatened in the least by our human attempts at idolatry and profanity. Why, even the devil himself is no match for God, for God has no equal. When Satan rebels against God or we as mere mortals take God’s name in vain or build temples in our own likenesses, the Kingdom of God is not shaken one iota. Contrary to what we might hope or fear, nothing created can disturb God’s rule.
Then why all the fuss about idols and profanity in the Ten Commandments? Because they shake our own confidence and trust in God. They disturb our faith and thus ruin our own identity and security in God. God is not thrown by human or angelic rebellion. But we are. God, while desiring a healthy relationship with each one of us, also knows that we need that relationship with Him far more desperately. We, who were created for holy and holistic purpose, are destroyed when that divine-human relationship is thrown out of alignment.
Years ago a friend borrowed my car for a quick errand. On sheer ice, he hit a curb, causing no visible damage. His apologies were honest as they were profuse. A thousand miles and a few days later on a cross-country trip, I blew both front tires after they quickly deteriorated from being out of line. My friend, a couple more thousand miles and some tires later, wholeheartedly covered the cost of repairs and tire replacements. It was a great lesson in how a little misalignment can make such a big mess. God knows we are made with a God-oriented center and when that center is missing or off-balance, we are in very bad shape.
Okay, if exalting God is so healthy for us, why are we all that easily inclined to do just the opposite, to worship other than the One True God, to make gods in our own likeness, to misuse God’s name? Inasmuch as we are made in God’s image, we have the ability to think, to reason, to focus our energies and thoughts freely and fully on whatever we choose. The heart of the universe is love, which means other-focused. God is love, for He is totally other focused.
What makes that love possible is that God as One is a Trinity, a Three-in-One Being. In Scripture, God the Father is described as devoting Himself entirely toward the Son, who in turn devotes Himself entirely toward the Father, and the Spirit is utterly focused on the Father and Son. We, as beings created in God’s likeness, find our true identity in being outwardly devoted or focused, first to God and then to those outside of ourselves.
At a basic level, idolatry and profanity alter that divine-human alignment. That focus, what we call worship, is taken off of God and placed on ourselves or some facsimile thereof. We choose not to worship God or deceive ourselves by thinking we are worshipping God when we are not.
Now we may think that in “worshipping” or focusing our energies on something or someone other than God, we are not being self-focused. But there is a fundamental problem with this attempt. For any attempt at love that bypasses the source of love becomes self-love. Can a person who does not know God truly express love? Yes, to the extent that he or she still retains that likeness of God, albeit a fallen or imperfect likeness. But the more that we are devoted to God, the more we can truly devote ourselves to others.
When we hoard who we are or what we possess it turns rancid. In a classic line from the movie, “Little Women”, the mother says of the aunt, “her blessings became a burden because she couldn’t share them.” This is the essence of black holes in science. Unlike a sun or star which gives off energy, thus radiating light and fostering life, a black hole sucks everything in, creating darkness and death. In the sphere of relationships, people absorbed in self-worship are the spiritual and relational equivalents of black holes.
Then why all the fuss about idols and profanity in the Ten Commandments? Because they shake our own confidence and trust in God. They disturb our faith and thus ruin our own identity and security in God. God is not thrown by human or angelic rebellion. But we are. God, while desiring a healthy relationship with each one of us, also knows that we need that relationship with Him far more desperately. We, who were created for holy and holistic purpose, are destroyed when that divine-human relationship is thrown out of alignment.
Years ago a friend borrowed my car for a quick errand. On sheer ice, he hit a curb, causing no visible damage. His apologies were honest as they were profuse. A thousand miles and a few days later on a cross-country trip, I blew both front tires after they quickly deteriorated from being out of line. My friend, a couple more thousand miles and some tires later, wholeheartedly covered the cost of repairs and tire replacements. It was a great lesson in how a little misalignment can make such a big mess. God knows we are made with a God-oriented center and when that center is missing or off-balance, we are in very bad shape.
Okay, if exalting God is so healthy for us, why are we all that easily inclined to do just the opposite, to worship other than the One True God, to make gods in our own likeness, to misuse God’s name? Inasmuch as we are made in God’s image, we have the ability to think, to reason, to focus our energies and thoughts freely and fully on whatever we choose. The heart of the universe is love, which means other-focused. God is love, for He is totally other focused.
What makes that love possible is that God as One is a Trinity, a Three-in-One Being. In Scripture, God the Father is described as devoting Himself entirely toward the Son, who in turn devotes Himself entirely toward the Father, and the Spirit is utterly focused on the Father and Son. We, as beings created in God’s likeness, find our true identity in being outwardly devoted or focused, first to God and then to those outside of ourselves.
At a basic level, idolatry and profanity alter that divine-human alignment. That focus, what we call worship, is taken off of God and placed on ourselves or some facsimile thereof. We choose not to worship God or deceive ourselves by thinking we are worshipping God when we are not.
Now we may think that in “worshipping” or focusing our energies on something or someone other than God, we are not being self-focused. But there is a fundamental problem with this attempt. For any attempt at love that bypasses the source of love becomes self-love. Can a person who does not know God truly express love? Yes, to the extent that he or she still retains that likeness of God, albeit a fallen or imperfect likeness. But the more that we are devoted to God, the more we can truly devote ourselves to others.
When we hoard who we are or what we possess it turns rancid. In a classic line from the movie, “Little Women”, the mother says of the aunt, “her blessings became a burden because she couldn’t share them.” This is the essence of black holes in science. Unlike a sun or star which gives off energy, thus radiating light and fostering life, a black hole sucks everything in, creating darkness and death. In the sphere of relationships, people absorbed in self-worship are the spiritual and relational equivalents of black holes.
2009-05-20
Authenticity, Idols and Profanity – Part I
“It may sound strange, but I've always thought of myself as an ‘agnostic’ on a lot of issues.” Those words are taken directly from an email response I recently made to someone who was commenting on my blogging in “Authenticity and the Decline of American Christianity.”
There are, I believe, some very definite absolutes, but they are fewer than is often assumed and they can only be clung to by faith. Yet even as items obtained by faith, they will hold up to a high degree of honest human reasonableness, being that human reasonableness even in its fallen state still has the Imago Dei impression, particularly when it is honest. Beyond that, a healthy dose of skepticism is the order of the day. “Agnostic” essentially means you don’t know, a rather honest admission.
Jesus spent as much time knocking down supposed absolutes as he did establishing the few key ones needed in this life. In one of my other blogs, “The Gatekeeper’s Key,” I am taking a slow and steady pace through the Gospel of Luke. At this point we are early in the book (chapters 5 & 6) where Jesus deals extensively with the assumed absolutes of the religious leaders of his day and knocks them off their feet one by one.
When a person (or organization) stops questioning his or her own "absolute" positions, he or she falls into idolatry, something that we humans are so inclined to do, it is put right up at Number Two on the Top Ten of God’s laws. Number Three (“Don’t take God’s name in vain”) is closely related. Something we generally fail to notice, profanity and Idolatry are two forms of the same deceit.
The deceit is that somehow we can either create our own gods or we can fashion the one true God into one of our own liking, thus becoming in ourselves Lord of the gods, or god for ourselves. In this, the second and third commandments follow the first, which states that we are not to have any other gods but THE God, the God Abraham worshipped.
Nowadays, whenever Believers talk about these first three commandments and the breaking of them, reference is usually made to the ways unbelievers disobey these commands. There was a day when idolatry was seemingly easier to spot – images, crude or elaborately crafted, pleasantly or grotesquely fashioned, the stuff of National Geographic photos and missionary slides. In today’s increasingly secular world, the imagery is harder to spot, less material.
Likewise, the 3rd commandment is reduced to simple, concrete substance, as in profanity, swearing by God’s name and the like. When I was a kid, my grandmother wouldn’t even let me say “Mercy”. Words had to have direct purpose to the context and they certainly couldn’t mimic obvious profanity or vulgarity, something to which I find ironic in the now commonly accepted use of the military slang “Snafu.” My daughter came home from school recently muttering “Holy Shoe” as she tried to avoid saying what she’d been hearing all day long. We advised her to drop the “holy” at least.
The greatest danger in dishonoring these Commandments is not in flagrantly violating them like some drunken sailor or a pagan witchdoctor. The clear and present danger is in trivializing them, something that we as Believers are ever so inclined to do. Idolatry is not just about tribal images made of wood or stone and profanity is not just about using the name of God as some casual verbal ejaculation.
It is wise to remember that the Ten Commandments were given first and foremost to those who already believed in God, to the spiritually faithful. At their most essential level these commands speak directly to the temptations of Believers in all ages. That somehow we will, in our own minds, ascend to the throne that God alone can inhabit.
There are, I believe, some very definite absolutes, but they are fewer than is often assumed and they can only be clung to by faith. Yet even as items obtained by faith, they will hold up to a high degree of honest human reasonableness, being that human reasonableness even in its fallen state still has the Imago Dei impression, particularly when it is honest. Beyond that, a healthy dose of skepticism is the order of the day. “Agnostic” essentially means you don’t know, a rather honest admission.
Jesus spent as much time knocking down supposed absolutes as he did establishing the few key ones needed in this life. In one of my other blogs, “The Gatekeeper’s Key,” I am taking a slow and steady pace through the Gospel of Luke. At this point we are early in the book (chapters 5 & 6) where Jesus deals extensively with the assumed absolutes of the religious leaders of his day and knocks them off their feet one by one.
When a person (or organization) stops questioning his or her own "absolute" positions, he or she falls into idolatry, something that we humans are so inclined to do, it is put right up at Number Two on the Top Ten of God’s laws. Number Three (“Don’t take God’s name in vain”) is closely related. Something we generally fail to notice, profanity and Idolatry are two forms of the same deceit.
The deceit is that somehow we can either create our own gods or we can fashion the one true God into one of our own liking, thus becoming in ourselves Lord of the gods, or god for ourselves. In this, the second and third commandments follow the first, which states that we are not to have any other gods but THE God, the God Abraham worshipped.
Nowadays, whenever Believers talk about these first three commandments and the breaking of them, reference is usually made to the ways unbelievers disobey these commands. There was a day when idolatry was seemingly easier to spot – images, crude or elaborately crafted, pleasantly or grotesquely fashioned, the stuff of National Geographic photos and missionary slides. In today’s increasingly secular world, the imagery is harder to spot, less material.
Likewise, the 3rd commandment is reduced to simple, concrete substance, as in profanity, swearing by God’s name and the like. When I was a kid, my grandmother wouldn’t even let me say “Mercy”. Words had to have direct purpose to the context and they certainly couldn’t mimic obvious profanity or vulgarity, something to which I find ironic in the now commonly accepted use of the military slang “Snafu.” My daughter came home from school recently muttering “Holy Shoe” as she tried to avoid saying what she’d been hearing all day long. We advised her to drop the “holy” at least.
The greatest danger in dishonoring these Commandments is not in flagrantly violating them like some drunken sailor or a pagan witchdoctor. The clear and present danger is in trivializing them, something that we as Believers are ever so inclined to do. Idolatry is not just about tribal images made of wood or stone and profanity is not just about using the name of God as some casual verbal ejaculation.
It is wise to remember that the Ten Commandments were given first and foremost to those who already believed in God, to the spiritually faithful. At their most essential level these commands speak directly to the temptations of Believers in all ages. That somehow we will, in our own minds, ascend to the throne that God alone can inhabit.
2009-05-13
Authenticity & the decline of American Christianity – Part V
As I mentioned in my last posting, the American “faith” of the 1950s ran smack dab into the turbulence of the 60s and 70s fully unprepared, a sleeping giant awakened in a reactionary and contrary mood.
For a decade starting sometime around 1974, I was in a spiritual turmoil of my own. It is something that most children who’ve grown up in the faith experience – or should experience in order for the faith of their fathers and mothers to become their own faith. What they accepted as a child they must wrestle with as adults. If they do not wrestle, they will either lose that faith or be left with an impotent second-hand faith that makes them little more than loyal church attenders, certainly nothing that will scare off any devils.
What was the outcome of my own faith wrestling? To make a very long story fit this blog, I came to the point where either I had to take my faith very, very seriously or give it up completely as not worth taking at all. A Christianity that only produces church-goers does little more than inoculate people to the true and radical claims of the gospel. An honest nonbeliever is less of a threat to the future of the church than a dishonest believer.
I can’t say I’ve been perfect in taking my faith as seriously as I set out to do as a Twenty-something. But in the past three years, I’ve come to a fresh conclusion that the choices I made back then were the right ones, choices that are still worth pursuing, perhaps now more than ever before.
Among the things I’ve been reaffirming is that God hasn’t called us to preserve some pseudo-faith notion of a Christian nation. God has called us to declare and demonstrate the Good News of Jesus Christ to all nations. The Kingdom of God is not found in a particular country or political party or a so-called “Christian” social agenda. Instead, we are to pursue the unique agenda of the Kingdom of God in all arenas of life, including the political and the social.
I submit that until we truly fess up about our immorality as Believers in the first half of the Twentieth Century we will not be able to confront the societal decay we are facing today. I speak particularly of the way we as Christians participated in or ignored the overt and violent racial oppression in our midst and then refused to involve ourselves in its dismantling, at first fighting racial healing, then embracing it only after that healing had become the accepted norm among the heathen around us.
More than any single sin, this collective racial injustice has muted our prophetic voice, making it almost impossible for the world to hear what we have to say. How can we speak to others about preserving the lives of those yet unborn when we have not done our utmost to preserve the lives of the already born?
In the end, the worst thing we can do is obsess over our declining percentage figure. What difference does it make whether 86% or 16% of us call ourselves Christians if the world goes to hell in a hand basket while we bemoan our fading figure in the mirror? Time to stop counting heads and start pursuing God’s righteousness and justice on all fronts. Time to be honest with God, our neighbors and ourselves. Authentic faith demands no less.
For a decade starting sometime around 1974, I was in a spiritual turmoil of my own. It is something that most children who’ve grown up in the faith experience – or should experience in order for the faith of their fathers and mothers to become their own faith. What they accepted as a child they must wrestle with as adults. If they do not wrestle, they will either lose that faith or be left with an impotent second-hand faith that makes them little more than loyal church attenders, certainly nothing that will scare off any devils.
What was the outcome of my own faith wrestling? To make a very long story fit this blog, I came to the point where either I had to take my faith very, very seriously or give it up completely as not worth taking at all. A Christianity that only produces church-goers does little more than inoculate people to the true and radical claims of the gospel. An honest nonbeliever is less of a threat to the future of the church than a dishonest believer.
I can’t say I’ve been perfect in taking my faith as seriously as I set out to do as a Twenty-something. But in the past three years, I’ve come to a fresh conclusion that the choices I made back then were the right ones, choices that are still worth pursuing, perhaps now more than ever before.
Among the things I’ve been reaffirming is that God hasn’t called us to preserve some pseudo-faith notion of a Christian nation. God has called us to declare and demonstrate the Good News of Jesus Christ to all nations. The Kingdom of God is not found in a particular country or political party or a so-called “Christian” social agenda. Instead, we are to pursue the unique agenda of the Kingdom of God in all arenas of life, including the political and the social.
I submit that until we truly fess up about our immorality as Believers in the first half of the Twentieth Century we will not be able to confront the societal decay we are facing today. I speak particularly of the way we as Christians participated in or ignored the overt and violent racial oppression in our midst and then refused to involve ourselves in its dismantling, at first fighting racial healing, then embracing it only after that healing had become the accepted norm among the heathen around us.
More than any single sin, this collective racial injustice has muted our prophetic voice, making it almost impossible for the world to hear what we have to say. How can we speak to others about preserving the lives of those yet unborn when we have not done our utmost to preserve the lives of the already born?
In the end, the worst thing we can do is obsess over our declining percentage figure. What difference does it make whether 86% or 16% of us call ourselves Christians if the world goes to hell in a hand basket while we bemoan our fading figure in the mirror? Time to stop counting heads and start pursuing God’s righteousness and justice on all fronts. Time to be honest with God, our neighbors and ourselves. Authentic faith demands no less.
2009-05-06
Authenticity & the decline of American Christianity – Part IV
We’ve been talking about the recent report that the Christian faith is in decline in America. As I’ve been saying this report leaves us with some very skewed impressions. And in some ways, maybe the decline is good news. Truth is, faith has experienced some very troubling times throughout American history, particularly during the middle of the last century.
When American Christianity hit the wild 1960s, it was with a watered down faith in the forefront and a navel-gazing conservative faith holding the rear guard. Unlike the robust Evangelicalism of the 19th Century, the Believers of the 1960s were by and large AWOL on the moral issues of the day.
Two things stirred the sleeping giant of American Evangelicalism in the late 1960s and into the 1970s. The first was a reawakening of faith as seen in the rise of a much more socially involved movement known as the “Young Evangelicals” and the whole sweep of the Jesus and Charismatic movements which brought fresh life in droves into the Church, shaking up whole congregations for the better. This was the bright side.
The second, and much more negative influence, was the reaction to a series of social issues which galvanized the sleeping giant into Moral Majority action. Or shall I say, reaction, for, unlike the positive thrust of the Young Evangelical, Jesus and Charismatic movements, the Moral Majority kind of energy only fueled an increase in the reactionary, hold-the-crumbling-fort mentality of the earlier Fundamentalists. Forget trying to find creative solutions to new issues and problems – we preferred to hold the line and stick our collective heads in the proverbial sand.
These social issues were the Civil Rights movement, the ban on school prayer, the War on Poverty, the Vietnam War, the Roe v. Wade decision of 1973 and other moral markers right up to the gay rights and marriage battle of today. Communism had been a threat in the 1950s, but it didn’t really impact the everyday life of the average American, at least not like prayers being silenced and blacks moving in and abortions being legalized.
What the Young Evangelicals and the Jesus and Charismatic movements did to faith was to drive people back to the Bible and to God. What the Moral Majority did was to get people to defend their homes with guns instead of advancing in creative energy under the leading of the Spirit to win the lost and bless the poor.
While white preachers guarded the doors of their churches so that blacks and atheists and abortionists and eventually gays couldn’t get in, their children were slipping out the back door to see where the spiritual life had gone. A faith that looks back instead of forward is a faith that has nothing to offer the next generation. Christians were being galvanized to preserve a culture, not to advance a faith. The theological mantras of an earlier day felt increasingly dry and meaningless on the parched lips of the faithful.
When we work to preserve a Christian culture, we better make sure the culture we are working to preserve is truly Christian. Unfortunately the culture of the 1950s American Civil Religion was not all that reflective of Jesus. Some causes were worth fighting for, but others were far more cultural than they were Christian.
When American Christianity hit the wild 1960s, it was with a watered down faith in the forefront and a navel-gazing conservative faith holding the rear guard. Unlike the robust Evangelicalism of the 19th Century, the Believers of the 1960s were by and large AWOL on the moral issues of the day.
Two things stirred the sleeping giant of American Evangelicalism in the late 1960s and into the 1970s. The first was a reawakening of faith as seen in the rise of a much more socially involved movement known as the “Young Evangelicals” and the whole sweep of the Jesus and Charismatic movements which brought fresh life in droves into the Church, shaking up whole congregations for the better. This was the bright side.
The second, and much more negative influence, was the reaction to a series of social issues which galvanized the sleeping giant into Moral Majority action. Or shall I say, reaction, for, unlike the positive thrust of the Young Evangelical, Jesus and Charismatic movements, the Moral Majority kind of energy only fueled an increase in the reactionary, hold-the-crumbling-fort mentality of the earlier Fundamentalists. Forget trying to find creative solutions to new issues and problems – we preferred to hold the line and stick our collective heads in the proverbial sand.
These social issues were the Civil Rights movement, the ban on school prayer, the War on Poverty, the Vietnam War, the Roe v. Wade decision of 1973 and other moral markers right up to the gay rights and marriage battle of today. Communism had been a threat in the 1950s, but it didn’t really impact the everyday life of the average American, at least not like prayers being silenced and blacks moving in and abortions being legalized.
What the Young Evangelicals and the Jesus and Charismatic movements did to faith was to drive people back to the Bible and to God. What the Moral Majority did was to get people to defend their homes with guns instead of advancing in creative energy under the leading of the Spirit to win the lost and bless the poor.
While white preachers guarded the doors of their churches so that blacks and atheists and abortionists and eventually gays couldn’t get in, their children were slipping out the back door to see where the spiritual life had gone. A faith that looks back instead of forward is a faith that has nothing to offer the next generation. Christians were being galvanized to preserve a culture, not to advance a faith. The theological mantras of an earlier day felt increasingly dry and meaningless on the parched lips of the faithful.
When we work to preserve a Christian culture, we better make sure the culture we are working to preserve is truly Christian. Unfortunately the culture of the 1950s American Civil Religion was not all that reflective of Jesus. Some causes were worth fighting for, but others were far more cultural than they were Christian.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)